New FCC Rules for Revocation of Consent under the TCPA
On February 16, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released its report and order concerning revocation of consumer consent under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The FCC order codified some of the agency's rulings on consent revocation and imposed new rules concerning revocation. For calls and texts governed by the TCPA, many such calls/texts require consent from the called party. The long-standing rule has been that once given, the consent can be revoked in any reasonable manner. The FCC did not change that rule but added specific requirements, including the following:
- Callers/texters may not designate an exclusive means for consent revocation.
- Use of an automated key press opt-out mechanism in a prerecorded voice message or a "stop," "quit," "end," "revoke," "opt out," "cancel" or "unsubscribe" reply in a text message is a reasonable means of revoking consent.
- Calling and texting parties will have 10 business days to implement consent revocation and not robocall or robotext the person who revoked consent.
- Revocation of consent for a particular type of calling is applicable to both robocalls and robotexts to that phone number. If a consumer with a phone number on the National Do Not Call Registry has provided consent to a particular entity and later revokes that consent, the entity may no longer make any telephone solicitations (regardless of the technology used) to that phone number.
The foregoing changes are not effective until six months after publication in the Federal Register that the Office of Management and Budget has completed its required review, allowing a business to make changes to accommodate the new rules.
Finally, the February 16 FCC order also seeks comment on a proposed rule that would require an automated opt-out mechanism for every call with an artificial or a prerecorded voice message made to a residential line. Currently, such a mechanism is required only if the caller does not have prior express consent.
Recommended
Day Pitney Litigation Department Chair Manuel Garcia-Linares was featured in the Daily Business Review article, "Florida Supreme Court Clarifies Qualifications for Court – Appointed Arbitrators." Garcia
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Litigation Attorneys Michael L. Fialkoff and Andrew R. Ingalls authored the article "NJ Appellate Division Holds 'Clickwrap' Arbitration Provision Enforceable," for the New Jersey Law Journal.
The arrival of Day Pitney Counsel Laura Land Himelstein was featured in the New York Law Journal's Attorneys 'On the Move' column.
Day Pitney Technology Counsel Laura Land Himelstein's arrival to the firm was featured in the Law360 article, "In-House Tech Atty Returns to Private Practice at Day Pitney." She has joined Day Pitney in both the technology, telecommunications and outsourcing and the data privacy, protection and litigation practice groups, based in the firm's New York and Stamford offices.
Day Pitney Technology Counsel Laura Land Himelstein's arrival to the firm was featured in Connecticut Law Tribune's Connecticut Movers column. She has joined Day Pitney in both the technology, telecommunications and outsourcing and the data privacy, protection and litigation practice groups, based in the firm's New York and Stamford offices.
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Litigation Partner Mark Romance co-authored the article, "Tips for Navigating First-Time Trial Preparation," for the ABA Litigation Section Newsletter.
Day Pitney Litigation Partner Richard A. Robinson was featured in a Law360 Pulse Q&A article titled, "Retired Conn. Chief Justice Discusses Career and New Role."
The news of Richard A. Robinson, former Chief Justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court, arrival to Day Pitney as a partner in the Litigation Department and as a member of the firm's Appellate Practice Group was featured in Diverse Lawyers Network's newsletter.